CWNP
Your Account   |   View Cart
Search:   

CWNP Daily Dashboard

Network Rightsizing: Kool-Aid Free Whitepaper Print E-mail
Written by Devin Akin   
Monday, 06 July 2009

You should know by now that I'm not a big fan of kool-aid...you know, the marketing propaganda from various vendors that spin everything in their favor.  That's why I'm happy to point out a new whitepaper by Aruba called, "The End of the Wire: Rightsizing the Enterprise LAN."  This is the most kool-aid free whitepaper I've ever seen from any vendor.  What's more astounding is that it's ARUBA...who is second only to Cisco in mass-scale kool-aid production.  I get at least 2 (sometimes more) press releases from Aruba each week (thanks Mike) that unashamedly bashes other vendors (especially Meru) while hawking the benefits of their own products.  Now, don't get me wrong, I understand the need for strategic  and sometimes aggressive  marketing, but these guys have it down to a unique art form. :-)  Back to my original topic: this really cool whitepaper.

 

Peter Thornycroft and Chris Harget have done their homework.  They give us real numbers taken directly from their customer base.  They have covered just about every angle I could come up with in order to answer the question, "how does Wi-Fi save me money compared to Ethernet?"  Super sweet.  I must congratulate these guys on a job very well done and Aruba for not inserting any sneaky kool-aid.  What makes no sense to me is why it took this long for someone to write such a whitepaper.  Every Wi-Fi vendor should be proliferating this message to their customer base, and the Wi-Fi Alliance should be screaming this to the industry.

Here are some of the highlights pointed out by this whitepaper:

* A phased migration strategy that allows the WLAN to be funded out of the reduced operational costs of the LAN
* Most LAN installations are overbuilt and include many unused Ethernet ports
* Two methods of auditing and documenting unused edge ports
* Realizing maintenance contract, network management, and power savings from Ethernet port and switch consolidation
* User expectations, such as guest access and mobility, and the provisioning of non Wi-Fi enabled devices
* The cost-effectiveness of higher sustained data rates on APs that can easily support many users in an area
* Comparing Wi-Fi deployment with sunk Ethernet switch costs with that of greenfield "All Wireless Office" sites
* Wiring closet size and requirement comparisons between wired and wireless deployments
* Going beyond Ethernet's 100 meter limit with Wi-Fi
* A comparison of WLAN and LAN management

EVERYONE needs to read this whitepaper.  The topic is just that important.  Read it today, here.

Follow me at www.twitter.com/DevinAkin

 

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Reggie, July 06, 2009
Thank God for CWNP , I just got back from Networkers where I went through the CCNP-Wireless and CCIE-Wireless briefs and learned that most of this is truly vendor-specific marketing for vendor-specfic products.

Met the first lab certified CCIE a cool guy named James Henry who went over the CCNP Wireless path. Met two other Cisco CCIE's R/S with CWNE certs. These guys are the lab writers.

I don't see how they can keep up with all the changes. Even itf you get your CCIE , it will be antiquated after the lab from what they teach in the CCNP-Wireless. To me CCNP-Wireless is the best path for Cisco.

I personally am not against or for any vendor, my job happens to use a lot of Cisco. I just like reading and keeping a vendor nuetral perspective and having whitepapers such as this are welcome.

Thanks Again CWNP for being open and relevant!
...
written by Craigap, July 09, 2009
Great whitepaper and like you say why hasnt this been done before, however... as a network installer, the only issue I see with the way forward on wireless only is the need for power!
For example, I spoke to a client about a complete wireless infrastructure and they stated they needed power. To have the power they needed floor boxes. So their argument was wy not leave adequate length under the floor so when the floor boxes are moved there will be ample flexibility, so they only wanted bare minimum wireless coverage.

Maybe the next major enabler will be power over wireless?

CP

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Add this feed to your online news reader

Google wireless search

Google Wireless Search
Google our favorite wireless sites for answers and information:

Suggest a site