802.11n Throughput Testing Methodology: Hopeless with Existing Equipment

802.11n Throughput Testing Methodology: Hopeless with Existing Equipment

By CWNP On 08/16/2007 - 4 Comments

I was a little perturbed at 802.11n when I first started testing it, and now, after discovering the truth, I'm just saddened. 


I turned off my entire WLAN network here in the lab.  There are no nearby APs, so my Wi-Fi environment is clean as a whistle.  I fired up a spectrum analyzer - again, clean.  Then I enabled my spiffy new Apple Airport Extreme Basestation (802.11n using an Atheros AR5008-3NX chipset) on 2.4 GHz using channel 6 and 20 MHz channel width (because that's all that is available in the Apple configuration settings).  I connected my brand new Buffalo Technologies dual-band 802.11n, 2x3 MIMO CardBus card to a P4 laptop with 1GB of RAM.  I started a file transfer, and... it averaged anywhere from 19 to 23 Mbps after several trials.  I get roughly 21 Mbps with 802.11a or 802.11g in the same "multipath hell" environment.  The laptop was sitting about 3 feet from the Apple basestation.  The client utility (I'm using WinXP/sp2 WZC because, if you can believe this, it's better than the Buffalo client utilities for this card) says I'm connecting at 130 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band.  I also tried Windows Vista Business using its integrated wireless client.  It also said I connected at 130 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band.

I decided to check out the 5 GHz band and a 40 MHz channel width, so I configured the Apple basestation for this (though it won't let you choose the channel).  My clients (both Vista and XP) connected at 300 Mbps.  I ran the same file transfer and got an average of 53 Mbps on both clients.  Again, big whoopie.  I can't imagine having a more multipath-rich environment than the one I'm in.  802.11n is supposed to smoke in the face of multipath.  Where's my throughput!  I decided to move my station away from the basestation - no change.

I made sure I didn't have any other bottlenecks by pulling the same file across my Gigabit Ethernet infrastructure.  I averaged 105 Mbps over a long period of time.  The limitation of 105 Mbps is likely my NAS where the file is stored.  

I decided to go for a little stroll around the lab and then around the entire building.  In the lab, it was varying from mid 20's to mid 40's using 5GHz with 40MHz wide channels.  Walking down the hall with multiple walls in the path between my CardBus card and my basestation, it started going down, down, down just like you'd expect...and just as quickly as 802.11g would have though I'm guessing that at the same distance, my 802.11n throughput is likely better than I would've had with 802.11g.  I don't really care to do that kind of comparative testing at the moment.

I fired up AirMagnet Laptop Pro v7.5 (with 802.11n support) to look for clues on this 802.11n slowness.  After looking at Association Request frames, Beacons, Data frames, and ACKs, I was even more confused as to what was happening and why.  Suddenly I found myself knee deep in the 802.11n draft again...looking at data rates, Tx/Rx STBC support, multiple spatial stream support, MCS support, etc.  Most every feature I looked at was disabled in the Apple.  All of the data frames in the 2.4 GHz band were moving at 54 Mbps and ACKs at 24 Mbps.  This explains the 802.11g-like speeds.  Nothing was moving at 802.11n rates (even though my client utility says it's connected at 130 Mbps).  My guess is that the existing Apple firmware is basically 802.11a/b/g firmware with minor additions that allow HT (802.11n) clients to operate, but not to take advantage of any of the new features of the HT PHY that give you great range and speed.  The client station has a reasonable number of configurable options (through the driver's properties in Windows), though it's not exactly an impressive list.  It's certainly more than the Apple AP, but hey, what can you expect for $179, right?

The supported rates for the client were only up to 54 Mbps as shown in the Association Request frame.  Tx/Rx STBC isn't supported on the Apple for 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz bands.  Beacons also show that the maximum number of spatial streams is 0.  Probe Request frames and Association Request frames (both sent by the Buffalo station to the Apple AP), are supposed to have an HT Capabilities information element in them (802.11n, section 7.3.2.49.1), but neither does.  This all adds up to, "you get what you pay for, IMHO."  Unfortunately, at the moment you can't pay for anything better because it's not available.    

I decided to test multiple transfers in 2.4 GHz to see if I would get added throughput.  Nope.  Combined throughput was still in the 19 Mbps range.  In the 5 GHz band, a second data stream boosts overall throughput up to ~70 Mbps (though it's a little jumpy).  These results combined with what is (not much) and isn't (most everything) supported in Beacons makes absolutely no sense at all.

Now once again I ask, "Where's my throughput!"  100+ Mbps as advertised?  NOT.  Right on Apple's website it says, "Blazing fast, it delivers up to five times the performance and up to twice the range compared to 802.11g routers."  On Buffalo Technologies' website, it says, "Blazing Speeds (12X Faster than standard 802.11g)."  Grrr.  I get 21 Mbps out of 802.11a in the same place, and often 19 Mbps on 802.11g.  Do the math.  5X?  12X?  NOT.  


4 Responses to 802.11n Throughput Testing Methodology: Hopeless with Existing Equipment

Subscribe by Email
Galang saputra Says:
01/30/2018 at 23:36pm
Harga besi siku baja
Harga besi siku baja
Agen pipa besi baja sch 40 sch 80
Harga besi wf
Agen bondek
undangan pernikahan unik
Supplier Welded Beam T beam King Queen Cross Castellated Beam
Supplier Pipa Besi baja
Harga besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton delcoprima
Jual besi siku baja
Jual besi siku baja
Agen Plat besi
Jual besi wf
Agen wiremesh
undangan pernikahan ada foto
Supplier Bondek Cor
Agen Pipa Besi baja
Jual besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton cakra steel cs
Supplier besi siku baja
Supplier besi siku baja
Agen besi h beam
Supplier besi wf
Agen pipa besi baja sch 40 sch 80
undangan pernikahan yang unik
Supplier Atap Spandek Sni
Toko Pipa Besi baja
Supplier besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton bjku
Toko besi siku baja
Toko besi siku baja
Agen besi wf
Toko besi wf
Agen besi hollow
undangan pernikahan ala jepang
Supplier Plat Bordes Kembang
jual laptop asus jual laptop asus
jual laptop asus murah jual laptop asus murah
Jual Pipa Besi baja
Toko besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton Sni Ulir Polos
Agen besi siku baja
Agen besi siku baja
Agen wiremesh
Agen besi wf
Agen besi beton Sni Ulir Polos
undangan pernikahan simple
undangan pernikahan arab
Supplier Plat Besi Hitam
Harga Pipa Besi baja
Agen besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton ais
Pabrik besi siku baja
Pabrik besi siku baja
Agen besi unp
Pabrik besi wf
Agen besi wf baja
undangan pernikahan ala jepang
Supplier Plat Kapal Bki Krakatau Steel
Pabrik Pipa Besi baja
Pabrik besi h beam baja
Supplier besi beton
Distributor besi wf
Distributor besi wf
Agen besi cnp
Distributor besi hollow
Agen besi unp
undangan pernikahan bermanfaat
Supplier Jual Besi Siku Baja
Distributor Plat Kapal Besi baja
Distributor plat besi hitam
jasa konstruksi baja
Harga besi wf
Harga besi wf
Agen besi hollow
Harga besi hollow
Agen besi siku
undangan pernikahan ada fotonya
Supplier Besi Unp Baja Profil Kanal
Supplier Plat Kapal Besi baja
Harga plat besi hitam
www.pusatbesibaja.co.id
Jual besi wf
Jual besi wf
Agen besi beton Sni Ulir Polos
Jual besi hollow
Agen Plat besi plat kapal
undangancinta.com
Supplier Besi Cnp Profil Baja Gording
Agen Plat Kapal Besi baja
Jual plat besi hitam
undangan pernikahan islami
undangan pernikahan unik dan murah
www.pusatbesibaja.com
Supplier besi wf
Supplier besi wf
ironsteelcenter.com
Supplier besi hollow
Agen besi h beam baja
undangan pernikahan cantik dan murah
Supplier Besi Hollow
Toko Plat Kapal Besi baja
Supplier plat besi hitam
www.jualbesibajamurah.com
Toko besi wf
Toko besi wf
Toko stainless steel
Toko besi hollow
Agen besi cnp
undangan pernikahan akrilik
Supplier Wiremesh
Jual Plat Kapal Besi baja
Toko plat besi hitam
Pabrik besi beton Sni Ulir Polos polos ulir
Agen besi wf
Agen besi wf
Toko atap spandek
Agen besi hollow
www.gudangbesibaja.com
undangan pernikahan bentuk tas
Supplier Besi Pipa Baja Schedule 80
Harga Plat Kapal Besi baja
Agen plat besi hitam
Pabrik besi beton sii
Pabrik besi wf
Pabrik besi wf
Toko baja ringan
Pabrik besi hollow
Toko besi Wf Baja
undangan pernikahan online
Supplier Besi Pipa Baja Schedule 40
Pabrik Plat Kapal Besi baja
Pabrik plat besi hitam
Pabrik besi beton psi Ulir Polos
Distributor besi hollow
Distributor besi hollow
Toko bondek
Distributor pipa besi
Toko bondek
undangan pernikahan modern
Supplier Pipa Besi Hitam Medium
Distributor Wiremesh Besi baja
Distributor plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton perwira
Harga besi hollow
Harga besi hollow
Toko Plat kapal besi baja bki krakatau steel
Harga pipa besi
Toko wiremesh
undangan pernikahan unik dan murah
Supplier Besi Wf
Supplier Wiremesh Besi baja
Harga plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton PAS
undangan pernikahan
link8

Says:
10/11/2007 at 13:57pm
Hey Larry good lookin out, it's been quite some time since you sent this. Nice going! Do the same test with a DIR-655 and a DWA-643/652/552/556 let's hear your comments then. I see 132 every day... FTP... using FLashGET Download Manager and My laptop when I'm at work here in florida. Then, the recpetionist at the building next door tells me what they changed there Guest login to.... and I hope oon ther 11n signal. They have a OC-192, and I am doing the DL...REAL BIG! Man I wish I could afford a spectrum analyzer... where you get it from EBay!

Kevin, LOYAL2TheGAME

Says:
08/24/2007 at 15:02pm
Before the latest draft n specification had assigned IE numbers from the ANA, the HT Capability and Information elements were 'wrapped' within a vendor specific element. It's likely that the IEs were 'wrapped' and the sniffer decoder was not able to dissect the information. The advertisement of 11n rates displayed in the GUI indicates that some form of 11n communication happened.

I am sorry to hear that those particular products didn't meet the expected throughput. I expect that the other combinations wouldn't behave as badly.

To answer Reggie's question, "What does the WFA test for?" - The answer is interoperability and the tool used to measure that is mostly throughput. The throughput threasholds are defined using an algorithm that does not result in the marketing campaign claimed "5x or 10x or 12x". Those claims are made by independant companies and not the WiFi Alliance.

Says:
08/16/2007 at 14:19pm
Yes, this is sad indeed. Personally I think these WLAN SOHO and enterprise vendors should use Planet3's expertise to validate their marketing their claims.

Perhaps Meru, Cisco and Aruba, Trapeze would be willing to send you their Draft N products for testing and getting the Planet3 seal of approval?


So what does the Wi-fi Aliance tests for?



<< prev - comments page 1 of 1 - next >>

Leave a Reply

Please login or sign-up to add your comment.
Success Stories

I literally just came out of the testing centre having taken the CWDP exam. The certification process opened my mind to different techniques and solutions. This knowledge can only broaden your perspective. Great job, CWNP, you have a great thing going on here.

-Darren
Read More

Working through the CWNP coursework and certifications helped not only to deepen my technical knowledge and understanding, but also it boosted my confidence. The hard work it took to earn my CWNE has been rewarding in so many ways.

-Ben
Read More

I want to commend you and all at CWNP for having a great organization. You really 'raise the bar' on knowing Wi-Fi well. I have learned a ton of information that is helping my job experience and personal career goals, because of my CWAP/CWDP/CWSP studies. Kudos to all at CWNP.

-Glenn
Read More