Why My WLAN Hates Your PAN

Why My WLAN Hates Your PAN

By CWNP On 06/20/2011 - 24 Comments

The 2.4 GHz unlicensed spectrum is anarchy. This “open” band is a magnet for any and all wireless consumer technologies, attracting everyone like FREE BEER at a frat house. With a big push in spectrum analysis lately, we’ve all been focused on non-Wi-Fi interferers like wireless video cameras, microwaves, motion sensors, and the like, for ruining our unlicensed frequency. But, with so many competing use cases for the technology and an open policy on spectrum use, Wi-Fi devices are perfectly capable of ruining the uncontrolled—I mean unlicensed—spectrum on their own. And they often do.

One problem with the Wi-Fi industry today is that there are two competing users: consumers and businesses. But, there’s only one industry group to represent and develop technologies for both user types. Consumers and businesses want more and better, but how that looks for the two groups is as far apart as my muscles are from Flex Wheeler’s. The Wi-Fi Alliance gives us some technologies driven from the consumer side and some from the enterprise side, but no one is driving a cohesive strategy for coexistence.

This issue is coming to a head as the Wi-Fi boom occurs in businesses and new consumer technologies expand into the market. Bluetooth uses Wi-Fi when large data transfers are necessary. The Wi-Fi Alliance is pushing consumer-driven ad hoc networking in the form of Wi-Fi Direct. And, Apple just announced a new proprietary ad hoc Wi-Fi connection mode, dubbed AirDrop, for its next-gen MAC OS. Though these features are designed for individuals and home users, the BYOD (or whatever you want to call it) phenomenon is bringing consumer technologies to the office.

The consumer-devices-in-the-enterprise problem is much bigger than security and device management. Both are problems, I agree. But, perhaps more detrimental to Wi-Fi network health is the possibility of creating an unregulated consumer network on top of an engineered network.

Designing and deploying a good WLAN is not easy. After taking the time to do it right, what’s to prevent consumer devices from setting up an AirDrop or Wi-Fi Direct connection on channel 3, stepping all over your well designed business network? Engineered WLANs in public or consumer-oriented spaces, such as a sports stadium, conference center, or university, will likely have the biggest problems from consumer networks and spectrum saturation. Speaking of spectrum saturation, 2.4 GHz is only going to get worse as more consumer devices incorporate Wi-Fi chips.

These new ad hoc protocols aren’t helping us out at all. In addition to that, client device vendors are notoriously unpredictable when it comes to implementing enterprise-friendly features. Most client device vendors target consumers, and their development processes focus exclusively on consumer features. There’s little client device regulation to help enterprises. So, not only do we get unfriendly protocols, but we also get networks created and operated by poorly designed client devices lacking enterprise management. Frustrating issues like 10 ms beacon periods, default operation on channel 3, poor protocol implementation (bugs), and proprietary “improvements” are inevitable.

If the glass is half empty, network admins have new headaches.

If the glass is half full, “job security” comes to mind.

Other than strict use policies and device control, there’s no real solution available today to protect our spectrum from consumer devices. Network monitoring solutions will have something to offer in the future, but I wonder if a better protocol-based solution could work. Perhaps there’s a way to protect engineered WLAN space from haphazard consumer networks.

Final Comments and Suggestions (FCS)
The consumer device infestation in the enterprise has a number of implications for our WLANs. In addition to device management, security, role-based access, guest access, and other considerations, we have to plan ahead for spectrum management issues. New peer-to-peer Wi-Fi protocols will impact the utilization of our RF space, and our mission-critical networks will suffer for it. Unfortunately, current standards offer no solutions. Perhaps business policy will be the best answer for a while, but a solid technical solution should also be pursued. In the meantime, let’s hope that client device manufacturers do their best to protect business WLANs as they implement consumer-focused features.

Tagged with: wi-fi alliance, Wi-Fi Direct, Apple AirDrop, Bluetooth, bandwidth, frequency

24 Responses to Why My WLAN Hates Your PAN

Subscribe by Email

alice long Says:
02/06/2018 at 00:06am
sage+1 888 336 0774 the quintessential success story in the Silicon Valley software industry with a remarkable contribution in giving a makeover to old and worn Sage Customer Service Numberout face of the 19th-century accountancy, has bestowed the with reducing the time-consuming paper-based and manual worksheets preparation job and making it a user-friendly digital phenomenon. Not too surprisingly, Intuit's or for that matter any Silicon Valley juggernaut's success Sage Customer Service Phone Numberowes its growth to a rapid breakthrough in the Information technology.

alice long Says:
02/06/2018 at 00:01am
QuickBooks +1 888 336 0774 the quintessential success story in the Silicon Valley software industry with a remarkable contribution in giving a makeover to old and worn QuickBooks Customer Service Numberout face of the 19th-century accountancy, has bestowed the with reducing the time-consuming paper-based and manual worksheets preparation job and making it a user-friendly digital phenomenon. Not too surprisingly, Intuit's or for that matter any Silicon Valley juggernaut's success QuickBooks Customer Service Phone Numberowes its growth to a rapid breakthrough in the Information technology.

alice long Says:
02/05/2018 at 23:56pm
Quicken+1 888 336 0774 dawn of the internet and the spectacular advancements in the computer hardware paraphernalia like printers, fax during the era of baby boomers had marked the usher in of a new era for digital accounting. Intuit's astute Quicken Technical Support Phone Numbercreators leveraged on the same and created what is today a $ 4.19 billion tech giant.

Lucy Gray Says:
02/05/2018 at 00:42am
Sage Customer Support Phone Number Customer who is not fulfilled or need to offers proposals to enhance Accountingpree administrations are welcome. We regard all client worries for pre and post bolster administrations. In the event that you are not fulfilled or issue not settled, we give the confirmation of 100% cash back guarantee* Talk Help: Sage Customer Service Number can get assistance from on the visit, working in client 24x7. Amid the occasion, government leave client can send disconnected message which will server next working day.

Lucy Gray Says:
02/05/2018 at 00:32am
Revive clients can without much of a stretch interface with us through different means. Clients can Contact Quicken Support Phone Number for all sort of administrations for Quicken programming and get help for settling their inquiries. Our group of professionals and administrators are generally prepared all circumstances; to unravel any sort of issues looked by the Quicken Customer Service Number clients. The Quicken clients can reach us through our Quicken Support Contact Number, if a specialized issue emerges before them. We assurance of a hundred percent fulfillment, with the specialized help gave by us.

Lucy Gray Says:
02/05/2018 at 00:26am
Quickbooks Tech Support Number: - QuickBooks supplies Company Owners and Bookkeeping Professionals different apparatuses which help their business to run proficiently. QuickBooks has numerous varieties of items that are unmistakable. All the Quickbooks Tech Support Phone Number independently employed individuals, Medium or Small Size Organization, ought to figure out which stock of QuickBooks is suitable for their organization.

anjilo smith Says:
02/03/2018 at 06:31am
Sage 50 Customer Support Phone Number +1-888-307-3506
With the assistance of Sage 50 Tech Support, business substances can invest some great energy in the center business, and not just on the managerial undertakings. Sage Technical Support Number
Sage Technical Support Phone Number With this product set up, bookkeepers are guaranteed to successfully keep away from pointless bookkeeping blunders.

anjilo smith Says:
02/03/2018 at 06:21am
Quicken Tech Support Phone Number +1-888-307-3506
Moreover, our sans toll number is accessible constantly, that is another best element of Quicken Phone number. The proposals are given through Quicken Tech Support Number
Quicken Tech Support Phone Number Quicken Phone Number at each minute in order to make it more agreeable for clients. In the event that you are searching for any Quicken help then 1-888-307-3506 is the best Quicken Phone Number for the customers .The number will interface you straight to the colleague of Quicken Mondo Patch.

anjilo smith Says:
02/03/2018 at 05:50am
QuickBooks Customer Support Phone Number +1-888-307-3506
Our QuickBooks Support Phone Number at 1-888-307-3506 and get QuickBooks Technical Assistance right away. Your call will be immediately exchanged to a client bolster delegate. Our normal reaction time is 10 seconds. We will associate you with our specialist inside 10 seconds Quickbooks Tech Support Phone Number
Quickbooks Technical Support Number who will help you to determine your issue with QuickBooks. You can likewise start a talk with one of our administrator and look for QuickBooks Chat Support on the off chance that you find visiting more agreeable .

Olivia Smith Says:
02/02/2018 at 06:41am
Antivirus Customer Service Phone Number is here to help. Call +1888-451-1608 Norton Antivirus Support Phone Number for all kind of technical and support queries.The best Norton Antivirus Support Number systems come with at least three basic features to enhance the security of your computer system, irrespective of whether they are free or purchased. Firstly, a good Avira Antivirus Support Phone Number system ensures that it receives updates on a regular basis so that it can keep itself up to date on the latest detected threats.

Olivia Smith Says:
02/02/2018 at 06:20am
Microsoft Outlook Customer Support is here to help. Call +1-888-451-1608 Microsoft Outlook Support Phone Number for all kind of technical and support queries.If you are away from your computer and still want to use the Fix it tool, then download and save it to a CD or USB flash drive etc. When you reach back home, turn on your computer, Outlook Support Number insert the CD or drive and run the tool.

Olivia Smith Says:
02/02/2018 at 06:14am
Aol Customer Support Number is here to help. Call +1-888-451-1608 for Mail correction, reset, forget password, account disable and unable, send or receive mail.Let's walk through these things one at a time. We will look at printers and email first, as they present the best example of how downloads are often better than CD installations. Aol Support Number Then, we'll move on to the programs you may have on discs, like Microsoft Office, etc., where saving money by not buying the upgrade is an option. Finally, we will cover the free installations mentioned above.

Jon Linton Says:
06/29/2011 at 13:18pm
The FCC arguement is interesting. As I understant the FCC really only regulates L1. The 47 CFR part 15 label attached to all these devices says to me that all devices have to accept whatever L1, L2, and L8?? secret sauce the vendors cook up. Consumer device don't have any more rights to the medium than the enterprise ones. However, the enterprise ones will like have a some smarts and tricks. DoS'ing a consumer device I would think would be legal per the FCC so long as you do it within the power/frequency restictions. So, who regulates interstandard interference. WiFi Consortium, IETF, ISO, IEEE? Feels like we are taking a step back. As far as WiGig, LTE is a bigger threat to WiFi than WiGig. Physics trumps all marketing.

06/24/2011 at 11:50am
Agreed, IF you think this is 100% a L1 problem. I believe that this is a L1, L2, and L8 (system intelligence) problem, all of which have to be solved creatively.

06/24/2011 at 08:30am
I agree that co-channel and especially adjacent channel interference is a huge potential problem at 2.4 GHz. One of the interesting issues relates to the legality of suppressing these ad-hoc networks. My understanding of FCC rules suggests that enterprises cannot legally preclude the use of FCC-certified unlicensed devices. Enterprises don't own the spectrum in their facilities. They can establish acceptable use policies for their employees, so that addresses some of the problem, but not all of it. For example, a University would likely have no legal ability to suppress these services in a sports arena. Perhaps we will one day see football ticket stubs with fine print restricting such use.

06/23/2011 at 22:46pm
Please don't throw virtual rotten tomatoes at me, but: Might there be a case to be made for using a distributed antenna system, designed to deliver full capacity to the worst/poorest-performing clients, to distribute the Wi-Fi signals? DASs tend to get rid of channel-changes and roaming, which are major causes of instability. OK, I'm ducking....!

06/23/2011 at 14:35pm
I understand the points on good WLAN design for enteprise, even SMB environments. I also agree we must recognize that consumer usage cases driving the adoption of PAN is a game changer. If you dont see the obvious - you will soon be out of business. That said- I'm not sure I agree that the sky is falling perspective that comes across in this article: PAN is the bad guy.
Reality is that consumers do not care to know the details on the underlying protocol or wireless setup. Its all about ease of use- or useful applications that use the underlying technology available. Its not a hard point to make your mom or dad is not going to setup a BT profile or create a Ad Hoc network to transfer a file. Not without several phone calls asking for help.
I dont expect to find a bunch of devices (applications) making use of WifiDirect that will have any major impact to a good wireless design. Nor do I expect to find the go home come back to the office consumer putting these applications on their laptops, if they are allowed to install any SW at all.
Just my two cents- we should be aware of PAN devices.

GT Hill Says:
06/22/2011 at 12:51pm
Protocol will never solve a L1 problem. Only L1 solutions can solve a L1 problem.

06/20/2011 at 21:22pm
Infestation. Nice word choice. ;) I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at how clever infrastructure vendors will be to solve some of the issues you've very adequately pointed out.

06/20/2011 at 16:55pm
with WiGig we are doomed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Gigabit_Alliance

06/20/2011 at 16:53pm
All I can say is Hurry up WirelessHD...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WirelessHD

06/20/2011 at 14:21pm
Enterprise WIDS/WIPS will soon automatically de-auth all WiFiDirect just like they do AdHoc today. Causing even more issues.
I think I'm leaning toward the "job security" outcome.

06/20/2011 at 14:18pm
Nice blog! My feeling says PAN's will be a greater threat than non-wifi interferers for large enterprise BYOD wlan's

<< prev - comments page 1 of 1 - next >>

Leave a Reply

Please login or sign-up to add your comment.
Success Stories

I literally just came out of the testing centre having taken the CWDP exam. The certification process opened my mind to different techniques and solutions. This knowledge can only broaden your perspective. Great job, CWNP, you have a great thing going on here.

Read More

Working through the CWNP coursework and certifications helped not only to deepen my technical knowledge and understanding, but also it boosted my confidence. The hard work it took to earn my CWNE has been rewarding in so many ways.

Read More

I want to commend you and all at CWNP for having a great organization. You really 'raise the bar' on knowing Wi-Fi well. I have learned a ton of information that is helping my job experience and personal career goals, because of my CWAP/CWDP/CWSP studies. Kudos to all at CWNP.

Read More